Ah, risk. It is the idea that fuels the anti-vaccine movement — that parents should be allowed to opt out, because it is their right to evaluate risk for their own children. It is also the idea that underlies the CDC’s vaccination schedule — that the risk to public health is too great to allow individuals, one by one, to make decisions that will impact their communities. (The concept of herd immunity is key here: It holds that, in diseases passed from person to person, it is more difficult to maintain a chain of infection when large numbers of a population are immune.)

Wallace’s hero is Paul Offit, a famed vaccination proponent and ‘public intellectual expert’ thought by many to be in the pocket of Big Pharma. He is a guy who is hated by the vaccination deniers, and he is a big believer in the state forcing its mandates on individuals. He says:

“We have seat belt rules,” he says. “Seat belts save lives. There was never a question about that. The data was absolutely clear. But people didn’t use them until they were required to use them.” Furthermore, the decision not to buckle up endangers only you. “Unless you fly through the window and hit somebody else,” he adds. “I believe in mandates. I do.”

This story is like every one I read in that it compares the number of people that die directly from the vaccination to those who actually die from a disease that supposedly would have been prevented by the vaccine. Of course, this makes the vaccination look like a much better risk. But never is there any mention of those who don’t die, but instead suffer from all the various diseases and disorders that destroy their quality of life – whether it’s autism or the numerous and varied (and unexplained) neurological and autoimmune disorders that permeate modern life. Thanks to Matt T. for the article tip.

As a related aside, visit Desiree Jennings, a pretty young girl and bride with her whole, wonderful life ahead of her – before she got a toxic injection referred to as a flu shot.

One highlight is, on Video 2, at the 8+ minute mark, Dr. Blaylock talks about the ineffectiveness of the vaccination. The vaccine is entirely ineffective, and it offers up an assortment of dangerous and life-threatening side effects, many of which have been analyzed by Dr. Mercola in the past.

On the issue of the safety of the adjuvant squalene, Dr. Blaylock notes that three articles declared it was safe. Of the three articles, one was produced by the manufacturer of the adjuvant, one was produced by the manufacturer of the vaccine (Novartis), and the last one came from the Department of Defense. Independent studies, says Dr. Blaylock, showed high incidents of lupus, multiple sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis.

In the last half of the last video, Dr. Blaylock asserts the importance of Vitamin D.

Here is the 4-part interview with Dr. Blaylock, courtesy of Dr. Mercola.

Listen to this conversation between some ignoramus from the Arkansas State Health Department who pretends he knows what he’s talking about, and a gentleman who inquired about an Arkansas plan for mandatory vaccinations. Indeed, the caller was weak on his points, and could have/should dunked the state worker many times over, but he seemed not to have proper points in order.

I’m surprised this issue is gathering very little resistance from libertarians on the web. I hear little chatter on such a vital subject. The health complications from this vaccination, for people who suffer from cancer, autoimmune disorders, other diseases, etc., could be significant. Meanwhile, Time magazine is preparing people to trust their government.

It’ll be interesting to see how the government handles resistance to the mandatory program that is headed our way. Big Pharma’s needles will never, ever make their way into my arms, spreading their poisonous juice into my body. That much I can tell ya.