“Mandatory Vaccinations Are Constitutional/Legal”

Monday, June 29, 2009
Posted in category Health Tyranny

“This is a law that goes back 100 years, maybe more.” What “law” he refers to, well, we don’t know because he doesn’t know.

Listen to this conversation between some ignoramus from the Arkansas State Health Department who pretends he knows what he’s talking about, and a gentleman who inquired about an Arkansas plan for mandatory vaccinations. Indeed, the caller was weak on his points, and could have/should dunked the state worker many times over, but he seemed not to have proper points in order.

I’m surprised this issue is gathering very little resistance from libertarians on the web. I hear little chatter on such a vital subject. The health complications from this vaccination, for people who suffer from cancer, autoimmune disorders, other diseases, etc., could be significant. Meanwhile, Time magazine is preparing people to trust their government.

It’ll be interesting to see how the government handles resistance to the mandatory program that is headed our way. Big Pharma’s needles will never, ever make their way into my arms, spreading their poisonous juice into my body. That much I can tell ya.

Be Sociable, Share!
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

11 Responses to “Mandatory Vaccinations Are Constitutional/Legal”

  1. Brando says:

    June 29th, 2009 at 3:42 pm

    I won’t be taking this vaccination nor my children. I will be spreading the word and hopefully more people will just say NO!

  2. Matt R. says:

    June 29th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    Great…and they’ll start giving these shots at what age? As the parent of a toddler, I can’t tell you how tough it is to try and negotiate your own personal choices with your pediatrician.

  3. Jeanie Queenie says:

    June 30th, 2009 at 12:14 am

    Check out this website for an interesting insight into what is really going on here.
    http://www.americasright.com/search?q=vaccine. This article and video which shows Biden speaking on said topic reveals the bogey man for what he is…a character bound up with instilling fear and panic in the citizenry..who woulda thunk?
    At any rate, for the latest on the swine flu conspiracy or crisis, check this out.

  4. Tom Osborne says:

    June 30th, 2009 at 1:38 am

    I have not yet heard of a legitimate reason for legislators to make vaccines mandatory. The argument that if a person refuses the vaccine, then they will be a carrier of the disease and therefore a danger to others does not hold water, for IF the vaccine worked, then a person refusing the vaccine would only be a danger to themselves, not to others, who would be PROTECTED by the vaccine. I could come up with all kinds of conspiratorial reasons why a vaccine would be made mandatory (for the financial benefit of the drug companies, nefarious, population control substances slipped into the formula, etc.), but no reason beneficial to the individual or public at large. I would go so far as to say that a vaccine being made mandatory is a sure sign that that particular vaccine absolutely OUGHT to be avoided. If they can’t sell it on its obvious and provable merits, then they can’t sell it at all.

    I worry about parents with children, though, because the tack the government could take is similar to that case where those parents in Minnesota who wanted to refuse chemotherapy for their child with cancer where charged with child endangerment. I worry, because, again, if the vaccine were provably beneficial, it wouldn’t need to be mandatory. I don’t know the history, but I imagine that during the great polio epidemic in the 1950s that parents were clamoring to OBTAIN for their children the polio vaccine; no government had to make it MANDATORY (or am I wrong about that?).

  5. Sal says:

    June 30th, 2009 at 1:17 pm

    …just read Executive Order 13295 dated 04/04/03 and discovered the following excerpt:
    By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 361(b) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 264(b)), it is hereby ordered as follows:

    Section 1. Based upon the recommendation of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary”), in consultation with the Surgeon General, and for the purpose of specifying certain communicable diseases for regulations providing for the apprehension, detention, or conditional release of individuals to prevent the introduction, transmission, or spread of suspected communicable diseases, the following communicable diseases are hereby specified pursuant to section 361(b) of the Public Health Service Act:

    (a) Cholera; Diphtheria; infectious Tuberculosis; Plague; Smallpox; Yellow Fever; and Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers (Lassa, Marburg, Ebola, Crimean-Congo, South American, and others not yet isolated or named).

    (b) Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), which is a disease associated with fever and signs and symptoms of pneumonia or other respiratory illness, is transmitted from person to person predominantly by the aerosolized or droplet route, and, if spread in the population, would have severe public health consequences.

    Sec. 2. The Secretary, in the Secretary’s discretion, shall determine whether a particular condition constitutes a communicable disease of the type specified in section 1 of this order.

    Sec. 3. The functions of the President under sections 362 and 364(a) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 265 and 267(a)) are assigned to the Secretary.

    This order was amended on 04/01/05 by Executive Order 13375 which contains the following:
    Section 1. Based upon the recommendation of the Secretary of Health and
    Human Services, in consultation with the Surgeon General, and for the
    purpose set forth in section 1 of Executive Order 13295 of April 4, 2003,
    section 1 of such order is amended by adding at the end thereof the following
    new subsection:
    ‘‘(c) Influenza caused by novel or reemergent influenza viruses that are
    causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic.’’.

    I’m just sayin……..

  6. Karen De Coster says:

    June 30th, 2009 at 2:44 pm

    Sal, an executive order – most of which are unconstitutional and/or criminal – does not make something “constitutional.” And, speaking of the Constitution, it also made slavery legal, as well as the Supreme Court did in their decisions. That’s why we look to liberty, or natural law.

    But citing an executive order? C’mon.

  7. Sal says:

    June 30th, 2009 at 2:51 pm

    Karen, forgive the absence of my commentary following my post: I am in no way advocating what these orders state. The “I’m just sayin” remark was pure sarcasm directed towards the language of the “orders” signed by GWB. The motive for posting those was to illuminate what might be the precursors to the ‘footsteps’ you referenced in your original blog….I am in full agreement that such orders are the result of direct abuse of executive authority. If it ain’t stated in the Constitution, don’t screw with it. Hopefully this clarifies my motive.

  8. Karen De Coster says:

    June 30th, 2009 at 2:54 pm

    Got’cha, Sal. Understood.

    In fact, I’m not even a Constitutionalist because I believe it’s a centralizing document. But in this time and place, the Big C is worth leaning on in light of what they’re doing to us in D.C.

  9. mles says:

    July 1st, 2009 at 7:06 pm

    Im sure the folks at various pharmacuetical companies that manufacture vaccines are very eager to see legislation passed that would mandate swine-flu vaccinations and the like. I wonder () if these same pharmacuetical companies make any donations to congresscritters, and seek audience with them explaining to our largely scientifically-illiterate house and senate members why we need to stick needles into all of our children, and how their company would be glad to provide truckloads of vaccine that the taxpayers can foot the bill for…………………………snuck into a farm bill or defense-of-children-bill, or by whatever usual ruse. You have my word Karen, I was not born this cyncial. Your blog has been enjoyable and enlightening b-t-w.

  10. Shannon says:

    July 7th, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    Vaccines are toxic and over used. I look at the recommended vaccine schedule for infants (aka living pin cushions) and shake my head. We are an overmedicated society with a pill for every ill. I remember getting a “mandatory” MMR vaccine when I was in high school. I called in sick and was home for 3 days afterwards.

  11. Michael says:

    September 28th, 2009 at 8:39 pm

    To all health care workers in the state of New York: There will be a rally in Albany tomorrow, September 29th, at 10am. Gary Null with be the key note speaker. Tell every health care worker and freedom loving American you know to come down and protect our loved ones from this tyrannical oppression. (BTW, the investors are the ones who will gain from the profits of mandatory vaccinations) THIS IS REAL PEOPLE!!! My fiancee is a RN and she has been told she will be fired if she is not vaccinated by November 30th. She knows the truth about vaccines as I have been following this through Gary Null, Gary Franchi, & several doctors who have had the courage to stand up to this tyranny.

Leave a Reply