I quote him here in his feminist ravings…“Anyone who knows anything of history knows that great social changes are impossible without feminine upheaval. Social progress can be measured exactly by the social position of the fair sex, the ugly ones included.”

His idea of social progress is anything but, when you factor in latchkey kids, parents who are friends to their kids, and not parents, moms who put ‘training bras’ on their 9 yr old daughters, or pierce their ears at age seven.

We can see so many of our US ills connected to his oft promoted and insane love of communism. The tearing apart of the family, so called women’s rights, the love and promotion of homos, the job of raising children to be outsourced to others, his disavowal of owning personal property, the blaming of capitalism on all economic woes, and the whackiest one of all we call feminism, or the call to arms against the family.

This is the notion he promoted, and that is, being a female in the traditional sense means that you lose your self identity, become an idiot and make no monetary contribution to one’s family, that is, the gospel according to X marks the Marxist Marx!

Communism to the rescue though….you too, can be a worker, even three times around if you are a woman under the saviorhood of Marxism. The big joke on women with this feminist and resultant commie thinking is that yes, she is freed from that maternal tie that binds for she can put that off by using day care centers, and substitute faux females in schools, all of whom form a family of feminist frumps devoted to the Hillary mantra, “It takes a village to raise a child”. Or in other words, if you stay at home and raise a child, you become a village idiot! Here in New England, if you do the 3 job thing of a paying job/keep your own home and raise a family, you need not worry about pleasing your man in bed, for the yellow pages in Boston is filled with oodles of pages of escort services. So much for the midget mind of Marx’s improvement on women’s lot! Marxist’s notion of
what is best for women has proved to be one of the biggest jokes not just for women, but on men and children, the biggest losers in Marx’s loser game. Destroy the family and you destroy a man’s incentive to live, grow, work, and succeed and to protect a woman and his children.

Has anyone noticed the link yet between women’s progress in the ‘work’ paying world and that boys are lagging behind in so many ways, a virtual national tragedy?

Decry like democrats do,
that capitalism is evil so that your men can renounce work that moves one forward in life and then you have the miserable state that Detroit finds itself in. Democrats have proven time and again, that Marxism is sick, demented, anti life and anti family, perverts sexuality, uses and abuses on so many fronts it would be impossible to address in such a forum as this. One wonders if Obama with his pathetic Single Mother’s Support Act within the healthcare plan, is just another commie tool to destroy the family. Under this act, as a single mother you have your hospital bill for birth paid for, your babies diapers and formula, your rent, food and utilities, your babysitter for while you are at school to learn a trade/free tuition, all the meanwhile, you the ‘freed mother’ can now depend on others to ‘teach’ your child, brainwash your child and perhaps even abuse your child, as you march forward proving to the world that you too can be a man in a skirt, and skirt the real issue of being a woman who makes a contribution beyond that of making gidgets for ABC corporation and giving uncle sam all your hard earned tax dollars. And your reward for this? Simply put, just believe in Marx and his mad man theory that women should stop being women and relieve men of having to prove they are men…women of the world unite…you can prove you are a man by taking on three full time jobs..and you get to support the state by so doing…and you get to play sexual roulette and never have to bind yourself to anyone at any time. Hell, you can’t even own private property. And you must knock capitalism. How lucky is that…to be mentally marked by Marxism?

Indeed he was if anything, mentally deranged. Need proof, think about this quote of his, ““The writer must earn money in order to be able to live and to write, but he must by no means live and write for the purpose of making money.” To Marx, I say WTF!! Apparently this ninc never heard of the concept of inhaling and exhaling. Seems to me that you need to do both, no?