Comments on: Blaylock and Mercola on the Vaccination Scam

By: Steven Cooper

Steven Cooper — Sun, 04 Apr 2010 19:39:41 +0000

Great post. Just stumbled across an excellent site with UK government documents on it - www.officialdocumentwatch.com is a really well built site and them seem to be very up to date - always posting the latest UK government documents released to the public. Worth a look.

By: cindyr

cindyr — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:36:03 +0000

With all the talk of codex alimentarius that the UN would love for us to sign we would be giving up our rights to protect of food products. Check this out via Health Solutions Foundation, Dr. Rima Laibow, who travels the world trying to see the international scope of things that can happen in the United States. Money is the bottom line for all of these scams. The best we can do is keep our hands washed, really well, and off our face, along with gargling with salt water 2 X a day. Also, eat wholesome, nutritious food to boost your immune system. Pray legislation is never passed making this mandatory. Health Solutions Foundation is fighting everyday to see that this legislation never happens. Please get involved with these organizations and send emails and/or faxes to your congressmen and senators. We can make a difference by doing something. We must protect ourselves, our children and grandchildren.

By: t.rex

t.rex — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:28:21 +0000

The vaccine is nothing more than a sly method to kill off large portions of our population who our govt deems “unproductive” (little kids and old people mostly)The vaccine has caused more deaths than the swine flu itself and is NOT intended to be a cure at all but rather a method of compromising the immune systems of those unfortunate enough to be considered “dead” weight by their elected officials.This is the MAIN reason they are discussing legislation to make getting a swine flu vaccine MANDATORY.I personally don’t care if you try to shove salvation down my throat,I refuse to be FORCED to do ANYTHING to my body by some asswipe in washington.

By: Matt R.

Matt R. — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:48:25 +0000

I’m also a fan of Dr. Blaylock and have been reading this newsletter for the last three years.

The propaganda for the flu vaccine is nuts, especially in my office. I stand out as the one person who is against it, but I could care less. Let the sheep roam where they may.

By: Bruce

Bruce — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:57:46 +0000

I’m on Dr Mercola’s email list and have watched the videos – they are excellent!….In fact after watching the interview I can not understand what the huge uproar is about. …this seems more and more like a manufactured crisis.

By: Splash Daddy

Splash Daddy — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:00:31 +0000

I have four kids, ages 13, 12, 12, and 10 (all homeschooled). Last week on Tues my 10yo wasn’t feeling well – a little quesy and a mild fever. He ran a low grade fever on Wed and had no appetite. His appetite returned on Thursday and had no fever and that afternoon he swam 1000yds no problem. My 12yo daughter started running a fever on Thurs and by Fri both her and her 13yo brother ran fevers in the 102-103f range. They were both still hot Saturday morning so my wife took them in to the pediatrician (literally around the corner from us). He diagnosed them both to have swine flu and he stated that my 10yo also had it but just got over it quickly. There was no treatment and he offered an RX for Tamiflu but according to my wife described severe potential side effects for very little potential benefit. He hinted that the vaccine was unnecessary but as with the Tamiflu Rx he kept stressing that it was “our decision.” They were both home before noon and took a nap. By that evening they were fine. According to news articles this is typical, with the vast majority of cases the patient isn’t sick enough to even warrent a doctor visit much less hospitalization. It’s a sham.

By: Jeannie Queenie

Jeannie Queenie — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:31:56 +0000

Adding to the mix of Big Guv and Big RX, you can now throw in the UN who from the following article is using the swine flu scene as yet another way for Obama’s redistribution of monies. Check this out from the Guardian… Swine flu could kill millions unless rich nations give £900 million—
swine flu pandemic could kill millions and cause anarchy in the world’s poorest nations unless £900m can be raised from rich countries to pay for vaccines and antiviral medicines, says a UN report leaked to the Observer. The disclosure will provoke concerns that health officials will not be able to stem the growth of the worldwide H1N1 pandemic in developing countries. If the virus takes hold in the poorest nations, millions could die and the economies of fragile countries could be destroyed. Health ministers around the globe were sent the warning on Thursday in a report on the costs of averting a humanitarian disaster in the next few months. It comes as officials inside the World Health Organization, the UN’s public health body, said they feared they would not be able to raise half that amount because of the global downturn. – Guardian
…The
article continues…….”The UN’s efforts were boosted last week when nine countries, including Britain and the US, pledged to give the equivalent of a 10% share of their swine flu vaccine supply to help fight the deadly virus’s global spread. In Britain, Douglas Alexander, the development secretary, pledged to give £23m.

Some officials within WHO believe, however, that this will not be enough. One said that richer countries were reluctant to pay out all of the money that was needed. “The downturn means that governments countries are reluctant to give,” he said.

Another said: “The money is a trickle, not a flood. It is going to be a struggle. If we are not careful, the virus could destroy a burgeoning economy or democracy.”

This is pretty strong stuff. But we recall that the UN recently used similar language to describe the crisis of global warming, declaring the entire world was in jeopardy if the warming trend was not stopped by decisive action (of some sort) in the next few months. Left out of the UN’s alarmist language regarding global warming was the fairly straightforward fact that many do not believe in global warming and that the world generally seems to be undergoing a cooling trend.

Conclusion: We wonder if the language regarding swine flu is similarly alarmist. If so, we begin to wonder as well if a conscious decision has been made by UN leaders to escalate the scale and severity of challenges of various sorts — not to better prepare the world, but to raise the profile of the UN.” So there you have it, there is now a trifecta waiting to get their grubby hands on your money..govt, pharma and the UN….so the big question is…who is pimping in the US for the UN? Couldn’t possibly be anyone on the Hill, now could it?

By: Lane Lester

Lane Lester — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:02:06 +0000

Let us know if there’s a print version of this interview. I didn’t quit watching broadcast television to start watching broadband television. :)