Big Pharma Covering Up Deaths?

Friday, October 2, 2009

A precious, innocent child’s life came to a cruel, sudden end. The Wall Street Journal reports that Natalie Morton, who died in England shortly following a Cervarix injection, did not die from the vaccination.The WSJ, in fact, almost appears to be swaggering behind its words. So you see, says the WSJ, no need to fear or stop the H1N1 vaccination program. There are pathology reports that absolve the vaccination and its maker. The HPV vaccinations are perfectly safe, as are the swine flu jabs. Thank goodness – I feel better already.

The pathology report states that she had an undiagnosed condition that was “so severe that death could have arisen at any point.” What was that condition? A “tumour in her chest involving her heart and her lungs.” A tumor (don’t like the Brit spelling) that just suddenly lashed out at her and attacked and killed, after producing no symptoms of a cancer tumor whatsoever? Is there a single person who is dumb enough to swallow this very inadequate version of her death?

I mentioned the other day that GlaxoSmithKline is working to get approval to sell Cervarix in the U.S. to compete against Merck’s Gardasil. Of course they wouldn’t allow a truthful report of this death, caused by the vaccination, to be revealed and thus deny its approval in the U.S., causing the loss of billions of dollars in revenue streams. As Mike Adams says, “This explanation is obviously a cover story to protect the vaccine industry; and it’s not even a convincing cover story at that.” Remember, this is a global vaccination program, with mandates growing and billions at stake. This is from the Wall Street Journal piece:

That sad case is a reminder to be wary of confusing proximity in time with cause and effect — a concept public-health officials have been citing in advance of the imminent roll out of the swine (H1N1) flu vaccine.

Ahh yes, coincidence! People, you see, may now fear the massive swine flu forced vaccination program the government is trying to shove down our throats. Can’t have that – declaring a worldwide pandemic and triggering hysteria means the growth of government control and a healthy, wealthy pharmaceutical industry.

Be Sociable, Share!
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to Big Pharma Covering Up Deaths?

  1. James Redford says:

    October 2nd, 2009 at 11:30 am

    The British government has a history of having their coroners concoct false autopsy reports. Let us not forget the recent case of Ian Tomlinson, who was assulted by police on April 1, 2009 in events surrounding the G-20 London Summit, and who died the same day. The first coroner’s report put it down to a natural death due to coronary artery disease. A second autopsy ordered by Tomlinson’s family found the cause of death was abdominal hemorrhage.

    “Tomlinson officer questioned on suspicion of manslaughter: New postmortem contradicts heart attack initially cited by police as Tomlinson’s cause of death,” Paul Lewis, The Guardian (U.K.), April 17, 2009

    “Death of Ian Tomlinson,” Wikipedia, September 29, 2009

    And the government is ordering coroners to delete mention of Tasers causing deaths:

    “Autopsy findings must be changed, judge rules: Medical examiner told to remove references to Taser as contributing to the deaths of three local men,” Ed Meyer and Phil Trexler, Akron Beacon Journal, May 3, 2008 ,

    In the case of vaccines, covering up vaccine deaths is very important to governments, as they want to set the precedent that they can forcibly inject us with whatever they want, which has to do with their misanthropic eugenics and depopulation agendum. This is the reason for the governmental promulgation of myriad forms of so-called “environmentalism,” as the population is being inducted from infancy into a death-cult which views the common mass of humanity as a cancer upon the Earth. Which provides governments pretexts in obtaining more funding, control and power in regulating every facet of a person’s life and in deindustrializing the West, thereby reducing the Western masses to impoverished peons who have no wealth and means to resist the government’s tyranny.

    Pertaining to vaccines, the below information is edifying.

    “Mutating vaccine causes polio outbreak in Nigeria,” Donald G. McNeil Jr., New York Times, October 11, 2007

    “Flu shot not effective in preventing flu-related hospitalizations in asthmatic children,” Keely Savoie, American Thoracic Society, May 19, 2009

    “Children Who Get Flu Vaccine Have Three Times Risk Of Hospitalization For Flu, Study Suggests,” ScienceDaily, May 20, 2009

  2. cousin lucky says:

    October 3rd, 2009 at 12:55 am

    Here are the stories the Ministry Of Truth has prepared for you to Swallow Today!

  3. Jeannie Queenie says:

    October 3rd, 2009 at 1:58 am

    I find it rather odd that they want to give Gardisal to girls as young as eight years old, and yet Merck’s own website on Gardisal offers this information which would hardly refer to any 8 yr old that I would know. ‘What should I tell my health care provider before getting GARDASIL?
    Tell your health care provider if you:
    •are pregnant or planning to get pregnant. GARDASIL is not recommended for use in pregnant women.
    •have immune problems, like HIV infection, cancer, or you take medicines that affect your immune system.
    •have a fever over 100°F (37.8°C).
    •had an allergic reaction to another dose of GARDASIL.
    •take any medicines, even those you can buy over the counter.
    Your doctor or health care professional will help you decide if you should get the vaccine.’ Looking at the bullets listed, where on earth do they get off thinking that any 8,9,10,11,12,13,14 year old girl need apply? And how does any doctor or health care professional help you decide when your Uncle Sam says you will get jabbed with a needle, like it or not?

Leave a Reply