Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Monday, May 2, 2011
Posted in category The Terror State

1,500 architects and engineers question a 47-story skyscraper that collapses at free-fall acceleration, straight down, uniformly and symmetrically, into its own footprint. They also cast aspersions on the chemical evidence found in the World Trade Center dust. These individuals are calling for a thorough investigation that uses the scientific method. No conspiracy theories, here – they desire a scientific investigation. This was on Detroit’s local FOX news at 10pm. The interview was conducted by this city’s most respected newscaster, Huel Perkins, which is why I post it.

Be Sociable, Share!
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

13 Responses to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

  1. Ishmam Faisal says:

    May 2nd, 2011 at 10:32 pm

    I doubt they’ll get their shot. The complaint will be something stupid like opening old wounds and it’s unnecessary after taking out Osama

  2. Jeannie Queenie says:

    May 2nd, 2011 at 11:40 pm

    It appears that this story will not die, especially now that we have spent billions in our attempt to get Bin Laden, and wars. Purdue University came out with a fairly convincing computer model of the 9/11 travesty in 2007. For the Purdue guys it was a no brainer how those towers fell the way that they did and the simulated computer video makes a good case for them.

    Of course, there have been droves of pilots, engineers, eye witnesses who claim other stories. Charlie Rose had a program a while back on this topic here at…
    http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=9870

    I find the computer reenactment from Purdue to be credible, but then I am not an engineer. Whatever, considering that the old ugly one, Bin Laden is now dead, for the second time :), we see a resurgence of the memories of that tragic day. Here is Purdue’s video..ck it out….
    Article is found here at….http://www.purdue.edu/uns/x/2007a/070612HoffmannWTC.html

    The video simulation is found here………..
    The animation (122 MB) can be seen online at http://www.cs.purdue.edu/cgvlab/papers/
    popescu/popescuWTCVIS07.mov

    A faster-loading version (9 MB) of the video can be found at http://news.uns.purdue.edu/mov/2007/HoffmannWTC.mov

  3. geoih says:

    May 4th, 2011 at 10:00 am

    He did see the video of the plane crashing into the building, didn’t he? Is it more likely that the achitects and engineers have inadequate knowledge and information about how a building will react under this situation, or that they have adequate knowledge and that some other unseen force caused the results?
    Ockham’s razor.

  4. liberranter says:

    May 4th, 2011 at 11:55 am

    The fact alone that a FOX News affiliate –in Detroit, of all places– chose to broadcast this is segment is heartwarming and encouraging. I do hope that the segment caused viewers to stop and reflect on the obvious. It’s long past time that the real truth about 9/11′s events be given equal air time with the “official” version.

  5. Jeannie Queenie says:

    May 5th, 2011 at 2:16 am

    The aforesaid 1,500 architects and engineers can flap their gums in the breeze all they want, but facts are facts. Anyone wanting to find out ALL the facts is well advised to check out what is probably the best site. Here they have managed to cobble up all available video or camera coverage for that fateful day. It may take an evening or two for you to get through all info presented, but well worth the time. If after viewing and listening to all these stories/scenes/voices/ and a historical perspective on the perpetrators, all I can say is that there are fools, and there are damn fools…and you’d have to be a damn fool not to come to the conclusion that this was no freaking hologram or a figment of someone’s imagination. NO, this was the real mccoy that leaves not a shadow of doubt as to what happened on that day and who was behind it. Who was behind it is now food for the fish where he was buried at sea.

    I was struck at some scenes where new yorkers being taken by surprise just gawked from the sidewalks looking up at one tower already oozing smoke and fire…they just kept looking up at that scene not realizing the whole building would come crumbling down around them in minutes. Sort of a metaphor for the warning signs all around us now in our country. We can stand and gawk and take a chance we will soon be part of the rubble….or we can choose to act to divert our destruction when the entire economic infrastructure comes tumbling down.
    I recall with chills the day Osama Bin Laden first gave one of his goofy videos warning us that our economy would crumble. By god allah, he knew of which he spoke. Worse, we now have the smoke and mirrors of insanity like QE3 being brought up.

    Make sure you watch the Purdue simulation of how the towers made their free fall in the fashion they did. And be sure to watch the Hamburg videos. Those four guys who made their marks that fateful day knew very well what they were doing.

    Watch and learn here at this site of various videos of 9/11….

    http://www.norcalblogs.com/gate/2010/09/various-videos-from-911-the-msm-will-not-show-you-warning-some-are-graphic.php

  6. Kris says:

    May 5th, 2011 at 10:50 pm

    I am pleasantly surprised to see someone in the LRC crowd talking about 9/11 truth. It’s much easier to just go along with the government explanation that two planes brought down three towers in NYC.

    Keep it up!

  7. clark says:

    May 6th, 2011 at 3:00 pm

    For me, Whenever someone says something is a “no brainer” red flags go up. For years the “government experts” all said investing in housing was a no brainer too.

    Jeannie Queenie said: “The aforesaid 1,500 architects and engineers can flap their gums in the breeze all they want, but facts are facts.”

    Aren’t the architects and engineers producing facts – and conclusions based on facts – when they flap their gums?

    Jeannie Queenie said: “I find the computer reenactment from Purdue to be credible, but then I am not an engineer.”

    Exactly.

    cowbot says:
    May 3rd, 2011 at 9:48 am

    “Jeannie Queenie is an israeli astro-turfer.”

  8. Karen De Coster says:

    May 7th, 2011 at 5:31 pm

    Kris – always, I work independent, and owe no one. It’s a great way to be. :–)

  9. Doubting Thomas says:

    May 9th, 2011 at 8:49 pm

    Facts are facts.  But what everyone seems to be missing is that the engineer spoke specifically of Building #7, not the twin towers.  No plane struck building #7.  One corner was damaged, and there were paper/carpet fires.  And then, it magically fell straight down, at free-fall speed, somehow buckling every steel I-beam and girder from which it was constructed.  it was not a fancy design like the towers.  It was old-school…and it collapsed just like a demolition of an old Vegas Casino.  It did not lean, flop over toward the damaged zone, or topple backwards…just straight down.  But facts are facts.  That’s why we got those weapons of mass destruction from Saddam, and we immediately began bombing Saudi Arabia, where many of the hijackers were from, to spread freedom to their land.

    And isn’t it funny that all of the video footage of the pentagon and surrounding area just doesn’t seem to have survived?  We’ve got video of Twin Tower folks jumping to their death, but we only deserve 5 frames of one view of the Pentagon hit.

    Bldg 7 Video:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5akpnIFK-RM

  10. Jeannie Queenie says:

    May 10th, 2011 at 1:25 am

    @Clark….and so your proof of what really happened is?????

    Clark, your first paragraph shows a breathtaking ignorance in the analogy you make between housing and this event. You are not talking just apples and oranges here, but sheer BS.

    Your engineering degree is from where? And your proof which is immutable can be found where? At least, I was honest enough to say ‘I am not an engineer’…all you can do, is blow something down and not replace with a solid argument showing otherwise, so hang it up! I’ll bet that you didn’t even watch the Purdue simulation for if you had, you wouldn’t have spent time, ‘flapping your gums in the breeze’.

  11. Jeannie Queenie says:

    May 10th, 2011 at 1:43 am

    Wow, it’s amazing how two people can perceive another in such a different light. I moved from Detroit decades ago, so I no longer have access to local programming, radio or tv, but

    Debbie Schlusser views Hugh in a totally different light than you do above…..She views Hugh Perkins as a Fox PC nutball as exposed here….”After all, on the same newscast, last night, Muslim ass-kissing anchor Huel Perkins (the one in the mustache in the video, below) said he’s not sure Bin Laden is dead, then proceeded to lie about what an imam just said on the air. But regardless of Perkins’ status as a spokesman for Islamic terrorism supporters, the FOX 2 News anchor–an employee of parent FOX News/News Corp and the face of its Detroit operation–couldn’t change the facts of the story of 20-year-old Jessica Mokedad’s murder at the hands of stepfather Rahim Alfetlawi.” We just get rid of Bin Laden for the second time, but females of the muslim persuasion just keep coming up dead…and yes, all the PC a holes refuse to call it for what it is. http://www.debbieschlussel.com/36714/another-honor-killing-in-detroit-muslim-kills-stepdaughter-for-not-being-muslim-enough-skank-us-mom-married-2-muslims/

  12. clark says:

    May 11th, 2011 at 12:56 am

    tisk tisk, such venom JQ

  13. M. Terry says:

    May 11th, 2011 at 1:51 pm

    PC bullshit has run rampant. Now a group of professionals (and others including family members of people who died in the 9/11 attacks) calling for a thorough investigation of the building collapses are dubbed “truthers” and thus dismissed as kooks. BTW – there’s also a bunch of pilots who are asking for an investigation, and who are also clearly kooks. Maybe they shouldn’t be “permitted” to pilot commercial aircraft anymore. After all, they’re just too crazy. Plus, the had the unmitigated audacity to actually question government findings on 9/11. Put them in rubber rooms, and double up airport security.

    People who called for an actual birth certificate are dismissed as nutty “birthers.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s9StxsFllY

    The MSM and armchair “experts” can simply dismiss people with questions as nuts, and attach to them an insulting name. Of course, if you don’t buy any single part of the official government explanation for any number of reasons you are obviously a nutty “conspiracy theorist” pariah.

    Perhaps the people who blindly believe government actors – (weapons of destruction in Iraq, etc) should be dubbed “believers.”

    A funny thing happened on the way to 9/11 – anyone remember Rumsfeld saying that trillions were missing from the Pentagon on 9/10/01?

    I worked as a consultant for too long reviewing government documents like GAO audits of executive agencies to believe much of what I hear as an “official explanation.”

    Oh, except I do believe that Bin Ladin was killed twice, President Kennedy was murdered with a POS Italian Carcano rifle, most full auto guns, grenades, etc. used my Mexican drug cartels come from U.S. gun stores, etc, etc.

    I certainly wouldn’t want a nasty moniker associated with MY beliefs. I’m just a humble “belliever” – please leave me alone.

    It’s actually much easier to be a “believer.” Just sit back, crack a cold one, and believe what the “authorized journalists” tell you. Like the “fact” that the recession ended in June of 09.

    If you don’t believe that, you’re obviously a conspiracy minded kook. Please check yourself into the nearest rubber room for your own protection.

Leave a Reply