Don’t Dare Criticize Freakish Behavior

Sunday, November 29, 2009
Posted in category Decivilization

On the Adam Lambert debacle:

In addition to dragging a female dancer around by the ankles, pushing a male dancer’s head into his crotch and simulating oral sex, walking a pair of male hoofers around like dogs on a leash, and furiously thrusting his hips at every opportunity, Lambert took a moment mid-song to fervently make out with (an allegedly straight) male keyboard player. After the jaw-dropping performance, Lambert told CNN that the forceful smooch was “in the moment” and was not a planned part of his routine.

Notice that Newsweek writer Julia Baird calls the reaction to this “homophobia.” Give me an effing break.

Yet the queers want us to look at this and tolerate it in the name of “diversity.” And by “tolerate,” I do not mean leave them alone to live their own lives and conduct voluntary actions that do not encroach upon the freedoms of others. In the modern, politically correct era, tolerance means to accept, appreciate, take pride in, and defend the perverted behavior of depraved individuals such as the freakish Adam Lambert. Whether this swine is a queer or not a queer does not change the disgusting nature of his actions. Yet he uses his queerness – as do all of the activist homosexuals – to push the queer agenda and to push the buttons of people who would otherwise say “no thanks” to being included in viewing such acts of debauchery. As people know, I am no bible thumper, but let us concede that straight people typically don’t want to see queer men making out and simulating oral sex. But that makes us “intolerant” and malicious. Uh, right. In fact, most people probably don’t want to see the actions described above between heterosexuals, either. (Count me among them.) So therefore, we criticize such uncivilized behavior.

Following Lambert’s gross behavior, the liberal network, ABC, canceled his appearance on Good Morning America. Good for them for listening to the viewers.

Lambert said this in 2009: “My goal was not to piss people off; it was to promote freedom of expression and artistic freedom.” Uhhh…pushing someone’s face into your crotch or licking their tonsils on TV is “artistic expression?” Perhaps if he was to drop his pants and take a nasty old shit on the corner of a busy intersection, that might be artistic expression that we all should appreciate? Thanks Adam, but sometimes definitions do matter.

Be Sociable, Share!
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

8 Responses to Don’t Dare Criticize Freakish Behavior

  1. cousin lucky says:

    November 29th, 2009 at 8:30 pm

    Count me among the folks that are very, very grateful that I did not see such vile behavior. Just reading about it upsets my stomach and makes me want to vomit!!

  2. Lloyd says:

    November 29th, 2009 at 10:23 pm

    To top it off, he sounded awful that night.

  3. Sonic Ninja Kitty says:

    November 30th, 2009 at 10:18 pm

    Also: did anyone ask that poor keyboard player what he thought? It looked like he did not welcome a creepazoid all over his face. Who can blame him? It was an assault. Blech.

  4. Chuck says:

    December 1st, 2009 at 3:47 pm

    Disgusting. Thanks for calling it what it was. Glad I didn’t watch it.

  5. Jeannie Queenie says:

    December 1st, 2009 at 11:46 pm

    “Perhaps if he was to drop his pants and take a nasty old shit on the corner of a busy intersection, that might be artistic expression that we all should appreciate?” Karen, you just don’t get it, do you? Don’t you realize that since the sixties, said artistic expression means anything goes, even when it is foul, meaningless, ugly, perverted or even evil. I took a drawing class after my first child was born and recall being chastised for making something look real…the idiot art teacher said, “when you draw anything it looks just like a photograph, so real.” Why don’t you put three eyes on the head or move the eyes to a different part of the face?” So, you see, this sick outlook has been around for quite a while…mold reality into something different than what it is, even if it is sick or ugly.
    I recall when I lived in the upper peninsula in the 70′s.,I took several art courses at NMU in the evening for two years. I was aghast at what they allowed students to do with alleged ‘art’. One exhibit featured a guy’s white briefs with crap dried on it along with some spray paint and it was labeled, ‘cosmic orgasm’. Can you freakin believe it? And no prof took objection to such meaningless crapola. Since the sixties we have seen a coarsening of our culture which has now deteriorated into this sickening cesspool of ‘diversity’ of sexuality. On the eastcoast, queerdom is celebrated. For myself, it makes me want to puke at the thought. Worse, our kids/grandkids are being taught that these perversions are simply lifestyle choices. Like you Karen, I am not a bible thumper…in fact, I could make a case that religion has created these moral monsters that abound today. As a former Catholic I shudder at the church having paid out over a billion dollars on lawsuits of pedophilic priests who destroyed many children. Of course, the majority of them were gay…the word alone, gay, is such an ironic term for men/women who are anything but. It bugs me to no end that anyone who objects to perversions or sickness is labled a homophobe…as if one has a phobia when they view anything disgusting, and hence, should be punished for their normal reaction. As the world turns, it gets more disturbed!

  6. M. Terry says:

    December 2nd, 2009 at 8:08 pm

    I’m pretty tired of this tired old “homophobia” crap. First of all, homophobia would, if it were actually a word, mean “fear of one’s self.”
    See, for example, the definition of homo sapien.

    I won’t break it down here. Anyway, who is actually afraid of some skinny little in your face homo like Lambert?

    What “homophobia” means to in-your-face gays is: If you object to objectionable behavior -like the disgusting crap that occurs at Gay Pride parades and festivals (google gay pride and San Fransisco for a REAL treat) you are “homophobic.”

    Bullshit. I’ll keep my sex acts out of public, and you do the same. We’ll get along just fine.

  7. Shannon says:

    December 4th, 2009 at 4:10 am

    Jeannie, I resonate quite well with you, as I encountered the same problem when I was in art school. Anything resembling a representational theme, is labeled trite or boring. If there is no shock-value to it, it just isn’t art. This is the prevailing attitude in most art courses today. Even in the so-called traditional fine art class, we were subjected to ridiculous projects that did little to further our talents and abilities. For example, we had to draw ourselves as an egyptian god or goddess, create a picture out of tiny dots, and turn an old masters work into a modern rendition. Just ridiculous. If any place is in need of serious reform, it is the modern day art school.

  8. Tommy Udo says:

    March 12th, 2014 at 7:17 pm

    You would have to find out if the guy who took a shit on the corner had an MFA. If so, and if he wrote out a little card explaining what it means and stuck it on the wall nearby, then it would definitely be art. That’s how you can tell.

Leave a Reply